Meron Langsner
  • Home
  • About Meron
  • Blog: Taking Note and Taking Notes
    • Most Popular Blog Posts from Taking Note & Taking Notes
  • Playwright
    • Plays Available for Production or Development >
      • Playwriting Press/Book Covers/etc
    • Slippery Slope Podcast
    • Selected Videos of Short Plays from the Gi60 Festival
  • Theatre & Performance Scholar and Dramaturg
    • TEX Talk: "The Impossible Body" (Tufts Idea Exchange)
  • Fight Director/Movement Specialist for Theatre, Opera, & Film
    • Photos of Combat & Movement Compositions >
      • Press Quotes for Stage Combat & Movement Work
    • Stage Combat Resources >
      • Martial Arts Resources for Fight Directors
      • Cautionary Tales: Stage Combat Gone Wrong
  • Educator
    • In-Class Group Exercise Based on MARISOL
    • In-Class Group Exercise for CLOUD NINE & BLASTED
    • Class Exercise: Muppets, Casting, & Shakespeare
    • Sample Assignment: Towards a Dramaturgy of Stage Combat
    • The Cinematographer Exercise: Introducing Non-Contact Blows
    • Dramaturgy Prompt Assignment
    • Selected Comments from Student Course Evaluations
  • Contact Meron

In Which I Write About Writing About Books

11/18/2011

5 Comments

 
In order to maintain some momentum in the aftermath of my dissertation defense and subsequent graduation, in the past few months I did a couple of book reviews for scholarly journals.  Both reviews will be appearing in the next few months.

My review of Eugenio Barba's latest book, On Directing and Dramaturgy: Burning the House (Routledge: 2009) will appear in the next issue of New England Theatre Journal, and my review of John Donohue's Kage: The Shadow (YMAA: 2011) will soon be appearing in The Journal of Asian Martial Arts.
I won't go into much detail about the books themselves here (I did after all just write reviews on them so that would be cheating), except to say that I had the good fortune in both cases of reviewing material that I very much enjoyed.

The scholarly book review isn't a genre I have a whole lot of experience with (I am in the fortunate position of having published peer-reviewed articles before having done book reviews), and I found it surprisingly difficult in both cases to even get started.  That said, in both cases once I got going I finished surprisingly fast. 

While I was thinking about this blog post I found a few resources on scholarly book reviews  that if I were just a bit smarter I would have looked up while I was actually writing the things and may shed some light on the task (I know that I have some current grad students among my readership):

http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/historyandclassics/BookReviewWritingGuide.cfm

http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/book-review

http://www.lib.vt.edu/find/byformat/bookreviews.html

The thing that's been on my mind is the function of the book review in the wider sphere of scholarly discourse.  Reviews are considered a lesser genre in academic life and do not "count" very much in hiring, tenure, and promotions from how I understand it.  So why do them?

Because all scholarship is to a large extent an ongoing informed conversation among interested parties, and reviews are part of the conversation.  If you are a scholar, you are in it for that conversation.  Reviews of scholarly books don't function the way a commercial review does, and may in fact come out years after the books themselves.  They're a record of one qualified individual's response to the work presented.  They can exist as part of the commentary on the ideas in a book, and also serve to promote the field and keep the scholarly discourse going.  On one level the scholarly review is an act of citizenship in the community.

Also (let's be honest), you get free books. 

In my case, I reviewed one book by a master theatre practitioner that is in part a retrospective of his life and career, and one novel (albeit, a novel written by a scholar).

Let's talk about Eugenio Barba's book review first, as that is the more straightforward of the two:

In the case of Eugenio Baraba's book, I'll be one scholarly review among many (I've actually seen others since sending mine on to my editor).  This is a book I would have read anyway so when I saw it on the list of options it was an obvious choice.  Eugenio Barba's work is very influential in several of my areas of interest, and he is a name to conjure by in physical theatre circles.  An opportunity to review something of his is not something I could pass up.  He is somewhat controversial in certain circles, but his contribution to the field is undeniable.

Now then, let's talk about me doing a scholarly review of Kage: The Shadow, which is in fact a suspense novel:

This was unusual in that I was reviewing a work of fiction for a scholarly journal.  It is a work of fiction with a strong thread of martial arts running through it, and it was for the Journal of Asian Martial Arts (JAMA), so it makes sense that such an assignment might come about. 

I find the author, John Donohue, to be particularly interesting as he is sort of a lesser known and more badass American version of Umberto Eco.  He is both a scholar and an artist (a combination that I can respect obviously).  Prior to receiving this novel his scholarly work was occupying a certain amount of space on my bookshelf, and now (much like Eco), he's represented in two genres.  As the scholar/artist double life is something I'm in the midst of myself, it's nice to see that there are people senior to me in both worlds that are making it work.

JAMA may be the only journal in which the pedigree of my black belt matters as much as the pedigree of my doctorate.  This journal serves a very specific (though very cross-disciplinary) niche in scholarship.  There had already been several commercial reviews of Kage:The Shadow in circulation when I got this assignment, and it was already being lauded as an excellent piece of fiction.  So in order for my review to contribute anything worthwhile to the conversation about the representation of martial arts and violence in culture (hey look, it's one of my academic specialties), I had t0 do something different from the commercial reviews.

I focused my review on the book's presentation of martial arts as a culturally transplanted practice, and about how martial arts were described as functioning in the action sequences.  This allowed me to contribute something to the scholarly conversation based on my own expertise while avoiding retreading the ground covered by journalists.  I also wrote a bit about the presentation of the practice of scholarship in the novel, as the protagonist is a PhD and his scholarly training is a major factor of both plot structure and character development.  As I'm in the position to comment on both of these factors in depth while being freed of having to cover everything that the standard book reviews covered, this was a really enjoyable experience.

Both publications are going to be coming out in the next few months.  The issue of The Journal of Asian Martial Arts that contains my review will be out very soon, and I believe that New England Theatre Journal will be out early next year.  You'll have to seek those journals out for yourselves if you want to read my reviews.  You might go check out the books themselves, they're well worth a read.
5 Comments
Cara
11/19/2011 07:14:23 am

Thoughts about reviews in the age of blogging? Is there a new duty for scholars to further academic conversation online? What do you think the relationship will be between invested bloggers and publications?

Reply
Meron Langsner link
11/20/2011 06:45:50 am

"Duty" may be too strong a word. I would use "opportunity." If we really are all in it for the discourse, then we may see a further institutionalization of the online conversation (many scholarly organizations have listserves).

What I wonder about is the impact of blogging and the degree in which scholars would hesitate to put their more serious work up in a non-peer reviewed public forum. Given the choice between writing a review for a respected publication and posting something on my blog, I'll take the publication.

Being able to continue conversations online is great, but I don't know that any institution is going to offer someone tenure or a promotion based on the amount of hits that their blog gets. There have been a few articles about this sort of thing in the Chronicle of Higher Ed and similar publications.

Reply
Matt M.
11/28/2011 08:38:15 am

For me, the book review process has been a great way to get acquainted with the publishing world. I'm meeting editors in a low-stakes situation. There's more quid pro quo going on, I suppose. So it has boosted my confidence for later (even if it won't help me get a job, necessarily).

Reply
Meron link
11/28/2011 08:50:39 am

I'm really glad to learn that the first year grads at Tufts are jumping right into publishing now.

The more that the overall process is demystified early on the easier it is to send out larger projects later.

Another good thing to look into is encyclopedia entries. They're pretty straightforward and actually pay sometimes. A few years ago I actually wrote one about one of my mentors from undergrad.

Reply
technical writer course link
10/7/2012 07:40:51 pm

Such an interesting & useful collection of technical information, Thanks for contributing your important time to post It would be knowledgeable & resources are always of great need to everyone. Please keep continue sharing.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Taking Note & Taking Notes

    Meron Langsner, PhD

    Playwright, Theatre & Performance Scholar, Fight Director/Movement Specialist, Director, Educator

    Archives

    June 2020
    May 2019
    December 2018
    February 2018
    January 2017
    October 2015
    October 2014
    August 2014
    April 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    May 2013
    January 2013
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011

    Categories

    All
    9/11
    Acting
    Adaptation
    Anthropology
    Boston
    Business
    Christie Gibson
    Collaboration
    Comic Books
    David Gram
    Directing
    Dramaturgy
    Edward Gordon Craig
    Fight Directing
    Filmmaking
    Freelancing
    Gi60
    Godot
    Hamlet
    Imaginary Beasts
    Internet
    Israel
    Israeli Stage
    Jewish Theatre
    Justine
    Lark Play Development Center
    Lmda
    Macbeth
    Marketing
    Marquis De Sade
    Martial Arts
    Merrimack Rep
    Metathearicality
    Mitx
    Muppets
    New Hampshire
    Opera
    Pedagogy
    Performance Theory
    Playwrights Commons
    Playwriting
    Psychology
    Puppets
    Romeo & Juliet
    Rory Miller
    Scholarship
    Shakespeare
    Silvia Graziano
    Skydiving
    Small Theatre Alliance Of Boston
    Social Media
    Social Sciences
    Stage Combat
    Stagesource
    Ted
    Tex
    Tom Stoppard
    Tufts University
    Vagabond Theatre Group
    Violence
    Whistler In The Dark
    Writing
    Youthplays
    Zeitgesit Stage
    Zillah Glory

    RSS Feed

    Follow @MeronLangsner

Resources

Plays Available
Stage Combat Resources

About Meron

Playwright
Fight Director
Scholar
Educator

The Blog

Taking Note & Taking Notes
Most Popular Posts

Contact & Press

Links to Press
Student Testimonials
Contact Meron
All content Copyright Meron Langsner 2011-2020 unless otherwise specified