I've been thinking lately about ephemerality of performance and mutability of texts.  And how a play is completed not on paper but in performance.  All of this is very Theatre 101 of course.  But as theatre on the whole is not performed for "'experts"  but for audiences, it bears repeating. 

A few of my current and recent fight directing projects are plays that I've done previously in other venues (or, in the case of Dogg's Hamlet, Cahoot's Macbeth, contain pieces of plays I've done in other contexts).  In the case of Romeo & Juliet, I've done that play so many times I can pretty much recite the dialogue around the fight scenes as well as all the commentary about how the characters might fight that takes place in other scenes.

A question I've been getting a lot is whether I just recycle choreography when I repeat plays.

That would be a resounding No.

The actors are different, the space is different, and most importantly, the director's vision is never the same.  Then there are also the logistical factors.  How much time are they planning to spend composing and rehearsing the fights?  A production with a three month rehearsal period, plenty of time to train, and a commitment to rehearse diligently will have different ambitions for a fight scene than a company with less time and money for the same play.  A production set in the Italian Renaissance will very likely have Mercutio and Tybalt face off with rapier and dagger, where the post-apocalyptic version may go with chainsaws (I am waiting for that version to happen). 

Context shapes the presentation of text.  This is something you learn in any branch of theatre.  As a writer, if you're fortunate enough to see multiple productions/workshops/readings of the same play, you get a feel for what has fluidity and what has consistency. 

By way of example, here are three videos of the same monologue.  Two are performed by my friend and collaborator Zillah Glory, the third was performed at Brooklyn College as part of the Gi60 short play festival a little over a year ago:
I'm posting these in reverse chronological order.  There are slight textual differences between the performances as the monologue is a work in progress (and may be the seed of a much longer work).  I'm using this piece as it's something for which I have multiple versions on video.

The piece is called Lying Makes Me Feel Like a God.  It is a portrait of pathological liar.  I had done some research into Borderline Personality Disorder to get the motivations, paranoia, and methodologies down.  Iago from Shakespeare's Othello was also a model for this.

This is the latest/last installment of this particular monologue.  I find it kind of overtly terrifying.  The character seems to be speaking from a place of confidence after having succeeded in something horrible.  This was probably the first time I'd seen Zillah play an unsympathetic character. 
This next one is Zillah in an earlier incarnation of the same monologue.  I find this one to be a much more charismatic character, and in many ways more dangerous.  This portrayal does not have the aggressiveness of the version above, but the character appears to be pulling the viewer in via confession:
This next one is a video of a stage performance.  The actor is Helen Huff, the director was my friend and long time collaborator Rose Bonczek.  Different actress, different context, completely different character.   The emotional shifts in this one are really interesting.  There's a sort of pleasure in confession (I am not sure that confession is the right word here, but it will serve).
I know of another performance of this that I unfortunately don't have video of.  It was performed by Emily Page Evans in a series called Monologues and Madness in NYC.  I'd worked with Emily back when we were both at Brandeis.  She's a talented performer and a very different type than Helen or Zillah.

Now then, taking this back to where I started the post, if the same set of words can lead to such completely different, valid, and effective performances, in two cases by the same performer, how can the stage direction, "they fight," possibly allow for recycled choreography?  As a fight director, one of my goals is that it be difficult to tell when the director's work ended and mine began.  Very often I get to work with the moments that lead into a fight, and of course whatever text is spoken during the fight itself.  The escalation of tension before physical hostilities break out is an important part of the storytelling process.  And each cast in each space will have a completely different chemistry in those moments, leading to very different choreography when the fight itself breaks out (to combine Clausewitz and Stanislavski, stage combat is the pursuit of character objective by other means).

Should anyone be interested in seeing more of either of these projects, the section of this site dedicated to my playwriting has embeded links to playlists of both my collaboration with Zillah and many of my Gi60 plays.
 


Comments

10/25/2011 14:18

Meron - excellent post (although the pentultimate paragraph appears to be cut off). I loved esp. seeing the different interpretations. The language you used is beautiful; your ideas rich. I'd love to see the full version of this play.

As for which version drags me in most, the second with the sweetness - the moment of loneliness mixed with hunger and twisted triumph when she hears/thinks "their friends become MY friends" is particularly effective.

Reply
10/25/2011 14:50

Thank you Emily!

And thanks for bringing my attention to the cut off sentence, that should be fixed now.

The multiple interpretations on video thing is an amazing resource to have as a writer. Especially when the interpreters are people who are excited about new work.

The full length (or one act) of this is on backburner right now until I have some other projects on their feet. This started as a stand alone piece but I started to have ideas for what the scene would look like when the recipients of the lies sat down and "compared notes" as it were. There's all kinds of funky stuff that can be done with character conflict where people starting as artificial enemies end up as friends or people who had been set against each other reconcile. Also, since I recently read Game of Thrones recently, where ongoing deceptions are such a such huge element of the plot structure and character motivations, that that's been in my head as a narrative device.

Reply
Robert Bochnak
10/25/2011 15:38

Hi Meron,

Great post! For someone like me (who has no training or education in the dramatic arts) I found the post very informative about the creative process. Please keep the great posts coming!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply